With the rise of online video consumption, streaming technology has rapidly evolved to meet the demand for smooth, uninterrupted viewing. Two key technologies, Adaptive bitrate streaming (ABR) and Multi-bitrate streaming (MBR), play a crucial role in this.
ABR automatically adjusts video quality in real-time based on the user's network speed, ensuring smooth playback even on fluctuating connections. MBR, on the other hand, offers multiple fixed-quality streams, and the viewer needs to switch between them depending on their network, without real-time adaptation. Both aim to provide clear video, but ABR offers more flexibility in varying network conditions, while MBR relies on switching between pre-encoded streams (with different resolution outputs).
In this article, we'll compare Adaptive bitrate streaming (ABR) and Multi-bitrate streaming (MBR). We'll cover how each technology works, their advantages, and real-world use cases. This will help developers understand which technology is best for their video platforms.
Bitrate plays a pivotal role in online video streaming, defining the amount of data transmitted per unit of time. Essentially, it determines the bandwidth a video requires for continuous playback. Here’s an overview of bitrate and its impact:
Bitrate plays a critical role in determining the quality and performance of a video stream. Here's how it affects user experience:
Video quality
Higher bitrates result in better video quality. A high bitrate means more data is being processed, leading to clearer images, sharper details, and smoother motion. A low bitrate, on the other hand, can cause pixelation and blurriness.
Higher bitrate equals sharper, clearer images.
Buffering and playback
If a video’s bitrate exceeds the user’s internet speed, the stream will buffer frequently. An optimal bitrate ensures smooth playback without interruptions. Poorly managed bitrates lead to frustrating pauses or loading screens.
High bitrates on slow connections can cause buffering.
Data usage
Higher bitrates consume more data, which can impact users with limited data plans. Low bitrates are more data-friendly, but they sacrifice visual quality. Striking the right balance is key for a good experience.
Higher bitrates lead to higher data consumption.
In essence, the bitrate determines whether users enjoy high-quality visuals, smooth streaming, or end up with constant buffering and excessive data use.
MBR is the simpler of the two (when compared with ABR). It involves creating multiple versions of the same video at different bitrates (e.g., 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p). These pre-encoded versions are stored on a server, and when a user plays the video, the server selects the most appropriate bitrate based on their initial network speed and device capabilities. However, once the bitrate is selected, it remains fixed throughout the session.
How MBR works:
Pros of MBR:
Cons of MBR:
ABR takes things to the next level by dynamically adjusting the video bitrate in real time, based on current network conditions. Instead of selecting a fixed bitrate at the start, ABR continuously monitors bandwidth and switches between different bitrates as needed. Videos are broken into small segments (usually a few seconds long), with each segment available in multiple bitrates.
How ABR works:
Pros of ABR:
Cons of ABR:
When it comes to choosing between Adaptive bitrate streaming (ABR) and Multi-bitrate streaming (MBR), real-world applications offer invaluable insights. Let’s explore some examples where these technologies have made a significant impact, helping companies achieve their goals and deliver exceptional streaming experiences.
Choosing the suitable bitrate for streaming is essential to ensure optimal quality and a smooth experience. Bitrate directly impacts video resolution, data consumption, and the chances of buffering. Based on Apple’s HLS Authoring Specification, it is crucial to strike a balance between performance and quality depending on several factors:
Recommended bitrates:
The ideal bitrate depends on various factors such as the resolution, frame rate, and internet speed. Apple’s HLS authoring specification emphasizes the need to use adaptive technologies like ABR to maintain the best possible quality across devices and networks.
For more detailed specifications, refer to the official HLS authoring specification.
Delivering a smooth and high-quality viewing experience is necessary and when you’re building a video-centric product or application, this is what really matters more than anything else. FastPix, with developer-friendly APIs for modern video products, stands out by offering Adaptive bitrate streaming (ABR) and HLS (HTTP live streaming) for video delivery.
Using adaptive bitrate streaming (ABR)
FastPix’s ABR technology ensures that your video content is delivered with the best possible quality, no matter the viewer’s internet connection. ABR dynamically adjusts the video quality in real-time based on the user’s available bandwidth. This means viewers can enjoy a seamless experience without interruptions or buffering, whether they’re on a high-speed connection or a more modest one.
Using HLS (HTTP live streaming)
FastPix’s adherence to Apple’s HLS specification guarantees compatibility with a wide range of devices and platforms. HLS is a widely accepted streaming protocol that breaks video content into small chunks, which are then delivered over HTTP. This approach not only enhances compatibility but also improves streaming performance across different network conditions.
By integrating ABR and following HLS standards, FastPix ensures that your video content is optimized for performance and quality, providing an exceptional viewing experience for audiences everywhere.
At FastPix, we provide the infrastructure and technologies to build video better. This reduces the technical complexity in video so developers and product builders can focus on what really matters – that is offering viewers with great viewing experiences.
ABR tends to be more bandwidth-efficient because it continuously adjusts the video quality based on real-time network conditions, preventing overuse of bandwidth. MBR uses fixed streams, which may lead to bandwidth overconsumption if the selected bitrate is higher than needed.
ABR can introduce slightly more latency due to the real-time adjustments in bitrate, especially when switching between quality levels. However, the trade-off is a smoother viewing experience with less buffering.
Yes, both ABR and MBR can be used in live streaming. However, ABR is generally preferred for live streaming because it adjusts to fluctuating network conditions, ensuring better stability during live events.
ABR optimizes CDN performance by delivering only the necessary bitrate for a user’s connection, reducing load on the network. MBR can put more strain on a CDN since multiple pre-encoded versions of the video need to be stored and delivered, increasing storage and bandwidth requirements.
Devices with variable network conditions, such as mobile phones and tablets, benefit more from ABR streaming as it ensures continuous playback without buffering by adapting to changing internet speeds.
ABR is better suited for high-motion content like gaming or sports, where network conditions can change quickly, as it adapts in real time to ensure smooth playback. MBR may struggle with such content if the initial bitrate selected doesn’t match the current network speed, leading to buffering or quality drops.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do